Dracaena trifasciata (Prain) Mabb. 'Laurentii'

Snake plant · Mother-in-law's tongue · African bowstring hemp

Family
Asparagaceae
Native to
Southern Nigeria to west-central tropical Africa and Tanzania
Habit
Rhizomatous perennial
Also known as
Sansevieria trifasciata Prain, Sansevieria laurentii De Wild.

Where it comes from

Kew gives the native range as southern Nigeria to west-central tropical Africa and Tanzania — Cameroon, the Central African Republic, both Congos, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Nigeria and Tanzania.1 Worth stating precisely, because “West African” is the usual shorthand and only Nigeria is West Africa proper; Tanzania is on the other side of the continent.

Kew records the fibre use the common name preserves: African bowstring hemp, whose fibres were used for bowstrings, rope, yarn and textiles.2

Naming and description

The checklist is right and most extension services are behind. Kew accepts Dracaena trifasciata (Prain) Mabb., published in Mabberley’s Plant-Book, fourth edition, in 2017; the basionym is Sansevieria trifasciata Prain (1903).13

Sansevieria is not partly a synonym of Dracaena — it is gone entirely. Kew’s Sansevieria page says the name is a synonym of Dracaena, and a search of accepted names returns not a single Sansevieria among them.45 I checked that query myself. The reason is a 2018 phylogenetic study using two plastid markers and a low-copy nuclear gene across some 45 accessions: Dracaena came out as a paraphyletic grade with two clades of Sansevieria embedded in it, so keeping the two genera apart would leave Dracaena not a natural group at all.6

The extension services are split roughly down the middle — NC State and Kew use Dracaena, while the ASPCA, UF/IFAS and Wisconsin still say Sansevieria789 — so both names are worth knowing when you go looking for care information.

‘Laurentii’ is older than it looks. It was published as a species in its own right, Sansevieria laurentii De Wild., in 1904, demoted to a variety in 1915, and now sits under D. trifasciata.1011 That predates the US Plant Patent Act by twenty-six years.

Fun facts

  • The yellow margin will not survive a leaf cutting, and the reason is structural. ‘Laurentii’ is a periclinal chimera: a yellow-pigmented outer cell layer wrapped around ordinary green tissue underneath. A 2025 paper states it plainly — true-to-type propagation from leaf cuttings “has proven unsuccessful”, leaf explants yield “exclusively green regenerates”, and division remains the only reliable method.12 UF/IFAS’s production guide says the same thing from the other end, marking ‘Laurentii’ and three other variegated cultivars as “usually reverts”.9 Mechanism and field observation agree, which is rarer on this site than it should be. So: divide the rhizome, never take a leaf.
  • The NASA air-purifying claim is two separate things welded together, and neither survives. The 1989 NASA report everyone cites is a study of volatile organic compounds — benzene, trichloroethylene, formaldehyde — designed to support a plant-plus-activated-carbon filter. It makes no oxygen claim and no CAM claim anywhere. Its snake plant test was one plant in a sealed 0.44 m³ chamber for 24 hours.13 A 2020 review pooled twelve studies and 196 results into a comparable measure and concluded, in its own title, that potted plants do not improve indoor air quality: the median single plant delivers 0.023 m³ per hour of clean air, so you would need ten to a thousand plants per square metre of floor to match the air exchange a building already has.14 Kew’s own page walks the claim back too.2
  • The CAM part is true, but it is not universal and not because the leaves are thick. A 2019 study measured nocturnal acid accumulation directly across ten Sansevieria species and found CAM in seven of the ten.15 It also found CAM correlated negatively with leaf thickness — the opposite of the obvious intuition — and that CAM and succulence arose several times independently in the group. I could not establish whether trifasciata itself was among the ten tested; the table is paywalled.
  • There is a second subspecies nobody sells. Everything in cultivation is subsp. trifasciata; subsp. sikawae exists.16

Care

Light
Very tolerant. Commercial production runs at 1,000-6,000 foot-candles (roughly 10,800-64,600 lux), and it survives a great deal less indoors — but survives is the word. Variegation holds better in brighter light.
Water
Let it dry thoroughly, then water. This is the plant people kill by kindness: it is built for a dry season and its failure mode is rot from below, which is invisible until the leaves go soft at the base.
Humidity
No requirement, and no source publishes a figure for it. NC State says only that it tolerates low humidity.
Temperature
70-90 °F (21-32 °C) is the published optimum for growth. Keep it above about 55 °F (13 °C); it is a tropical African plant and cold wet roots are the worst combination for it.
Substrate
Free-draining, and pH somewhere in the 6.0-7.5 range where the two published recommendations overlap. Grit or perlite matters more than the base.
Fertilizer
Sparingly, and only in growth. Watch the water supply: this genus is on the published list of fluoride-sensitive plants, where superphosphate and perlite are named as sources — though the entry was written for the old narrower Dracaena, which is worth saying rather than glossing.
Propagation
Division of the rhizome. Leaf cuttings root easily but come up plain green — see the species page; for a variegated plant this is the difference between keeping it and losing it.
Dormancy
None documented. Growth slows in winter; the watering slows with it.
Common problems
  • Soft, foul-smelling rot at the leaf base is Erwinia soft rot, and it follows overwatering
  • Southern blight (Sclerotium rolfsii) and Fusarium red leaf spot are the other two named organisms in the production literature
  • Root-knot nematodes in reused mix
  • A leaf cutting of a variegated plant reverts to plain green. This is not bad luck — it is what the tissue is
  • Mushy crown after a cold spell; it does not tolerate cold and wet together
  • Every part is toxic to cats and dogs — saponins — and unlike most of this list, that is well established